Besides membership in NATO, what economic changes will occur if Scotland is "independent" as opposed to being part of the UK.
The currency for one. As of now the markets are selling anything remotely affiliated with Scottish owned business.
Besides membership in NATO, what economic changes will occur if Scotland is "independent" as opposed to being part of the UK.
Andy_S wrote:My sense is that the "Ayes" will take it at the last minute in a tight, tight vote.
As an Englishman, I have been dismayed by the "No" camp's arguments: Their whole angle is fear-based, rather than being based on the positives of what is, by the standards of global history and governance, a pretty successful 300-year union. In short, I can't blame yes-voting Jocks for being anti-Westminster if this is the best our brightest political minds can come up with.
OTOH....I have been even less impressed by the "Yes" camp's arguments, which are evasive, emotive and downright Utopian rather than inclusive, rational or plain realistic.
But given that we humans - yes, even the famously "dour Scots" - are emotional rather than rational creatures, I suspect that this is why "Yes" will emerge (narrowly) victorious.
Personally, I don't want to see a breakup of the Union: after all, if two parties want a divorce, all is good, but if just one party wants it, it can be very bitter.
Even so, if that is what the Scots want...they have been given the opportunity, so good luck and God speed to them all. They may - just may - show a bright shining light for the powers of a smaller, devolved state that will set an important precedent in the years and decades to come.
And if "rump UK" accepts Scottish independence without an uproar, then that is the sign of a very, very enlightened polity indeed: How many other nations would let 10 percent of their land and population simply go their own way after a (close) referendum? This would be democracy to the max.
Above all, I would hope good cross-border relations endure. But they may not.
If it is "yes," the best possible outcome would then be for a sensible, just and moderate disentanglement process, equably negotiated between Westminster and Holyrood in a grown-up manner with an eye toward future friendly relations. This would be the common-sensical approach.
The worst possible outcome would be for a bad-tempered, vindictive or high-handed disengagement that would create immediate resentment and instability, and sew the sees for decades of bitterness and ill-feeling on both sides.
Interesting days ahead; I may just have to invest in a claymore, dirk and pistol.
The currency for one. As of now the markets are selling anything remotely affiliated with Scottish owned business.
Mr_Wood wrote:most yes voters seem to be voting from their hearts, the no's are thinking about it all a bit more and are seem to be slightly more open minded.
Sorry but this is startlingly patronizing and shows a complete lack of understanding of what is happening. Do you seriously think that the thousands of people who have moved from a No to a Yes have not tried to research the issues?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests