cloudz wrote:D_Glenn wrote:
After a sufficient amount of filling the Dantian by putting 意 'Yi'/ intention on the area and also physically expanding out while contracting in to solidify the abdomen plus the stress put on the area through striking and the body begins to pack this area of the lower abdomen in with flesh. The Dantian is a Daoist term, in TCM it's called 氣海 Qihai point (sea of qi). Needling this point can promote the growth of flesh while burning out fat. Putting our 'Yi' on the same point has the same effect.
I think putting our intent and attention here is good practice. Not sure about the growing of flesh and burning of fat you mention though, I find that a little hoky.. I've gone with the idea that the dantien areas contain more neuro transmitters/ nerve clusters - that sort of thing. So the idea of putting our intent there, "sinking qi to dantien", I find conducive to good practice. These areas could be in effect like "little brains".. A while back there was research that demonstrated how our gut instincts where based in scientific reality, same sort of thing.
As I said in the other thread: In the [Chinese] Internal martial arts there is a saying "Every strike is a throw and every throw is a strike." This is representative of how strikes or punches are generated in the same way that one has to generate the force required to throw someone: from the core (dantian) and the legs. An IMA punch is not the same as a western punch, it's a throw that strikes.
So the dantian is also used in strikes as well as throws.
.
I disagree slightly with you here.. I agree that the dantien is involved in all movements - throw, strike, whatever.
Where I disagree is that you make it sound that there is just one way, or method of hitting in IMA. I think that there is a corelation to what is called "long power" and push hits - "strikes that throw". This "long power" is what moves a structure through space, it could look more like a strike, or it could look like a throw, but the mechanic and the result is the same. Long power is not the only way to hit someone though. A penetrating strike into a structure (not through) does not do this, it acts like more of a whip like mechanic. I've come to know this as "short power" which is not how people normally use that term, which is often conflated with "inch power".
So I basically disagree with your conclusion
"An IMA punch is not the same as a western punch, it's a throw that strikes"
When using long power you are generally right, because i would say this isn't really common in W. Boxing. However i would strongly disagree that those striking mechanics are the only way to strike in IMA. ie. always moving the targeted structure through space with the hit..
D_Glenn wrote:cloudz wrote:D_Glenn wrote:
After a sufficient amount of filling the Dantian by putting 意 'Yi'/ intention on the area and also physically expanding out while contracting in to solidify the abdomen plus the stress put on the area through striking and the body begins to pack this area of the lower abdomen in with flesh. The Dantian is a Daoist term, in TCM it's called 氣海 Qihai point (sea of qi). Needling this point can promote the growth of flesh while burning out fat. Putting our 'Yi' on the same point has the same effect.
I think putting our intent and attention here is good practice. Not sure about the growing of flesh and burning of fat you mention though, I find that a little hoky.. I've gone with the idea that the dantien areas contain more neuro transmitters/ nerve clusters - that sort of thing. So the idea of putting our intent there, "sinking qi to dantien", I find conducive to good practice. These areas could be in effect like "little brains".. A while back there was research that demonstrated how our gut instincts where based in scientific reality, same sort of thing.
That comes right out of Classical text on Chinese Medicine and are not really my own words, so I don't know what to tell you about that.
(I wanted to add though that while 氣海 Qihai point is represented by a dot on the skin in a meridian chart, it requires a pretty long needle to actually hit the point or 'True Dantian'. So Qihai is the same as Dantian.)As I said in the other thread: In the [Chinese] Internal martial arts there is a saying "Every strike is a throw and every throw is a strike." This is representative of how strikes or punches are generated in the same way that one has to generate the force required to throw someone: from the core (dantian) and the legs. An IMA punch is not the same as a western punch, it's a throw that strikes.
So the dantian is also used in strikes as well as throws.
.
I disagree slightly with you here.. I agree that the dantien is involved in all movements - throw, strike, whatever.
Where I disagree is that you make it sound that there is just one way, or method of hitting in IMA. I think that there is a corelation to what is called "long power" and push hits - "strikes that throw". This "long power" is what moves a structure through space, it could look more like a strike, or it could look like a throw, but the mechanic and the result is the same. Long power is not the only way to hit someone though. A penetrating strike into a structure (not through) does not do this, it acts like more of a whip like mechanic. I've come to know this as "short power" which is not how people normally use that term, which is often conflated with "inch power".
So I basically disagree with your conclusion
"An IMA punch is not the same as a western punch, it's a throw that strikes"
When using long power you are generally right, because i would say this isn't really common in W. Boxing. However i would strongly disagree that those striking mechanics are the only way to strike in IMA. ie. always moving the targeted structure through space with the hit..
Long or short power both require 'Fali' behind it, whether it's a long Jin or short Jin depends on how you shape the Jin.
So what you say is correct. I'm not saying that every strike causes someone to fly away but if it does it is 'long jin', if it stops short, it's 'short jin'. But mechanically the two are still generated in the same manner from the Dantian.
.
Sprint wrote:Also when someone talks of moving from the dantian, does that mean that before you move you consciously engage muscles of the dantian area first?
everything wrote:The dantian is not a muscle. Core muscle is a separate very good concern. That, cog, the b.s. vid are red herrings. If you don't like the idea of qi hugging you should probably forget about dantian and stick to core, cog, etc. And at most "yi" and visualization. These are all scientifically accepted and practical.
If you are not an anti- qi type, just do qigong and sink qi to dantian. It seems to increase "flow" of the "current" by "storing" it in this area. Ideally that "powers" you. Like some kind of electromagnetic energy rather than mechanical energy from an electrical impulse causing tension in soft tissue that moves bones. Since you're in yiquan which doesn't seem to want to talk qi, if you do not outright dismiss the taikiken stories of WXZ, how could he have thrown Sawai as described?...And why would sawai say his heart felt struck by a needle and he was shaking? Couldn't be psychological only - the guy was fifth Dan in judo and no doubt tough.
sprint wrote:"were the descriptions of the dantian meant to be taken literally, or would they be seen as figurative and guides to physical activity.."
Sprint wrote:Looking at the vid of the guy lying on the floor moving the weight with his dantian has confused me somewhat. Why is it that his dantian is allowed to move but the rest of his body is stationery? Surely if the point is to use the dantian to connect to, or power the arms etc then they ought to be moving as a consequence of the dantian moving? Also when someone talks of moving from the dantian, does that mean that before you move you consciously engage muscles of the dantian area first?
Sprint wrote:
One thing I had wondered at the start of this thread was were the descriptions of the dantian meant to be taken literally, or would they be seen as figurative and guides to physical activity. I am open to hearing differing interpretations. I do however draw the line at empty force. If the phenomena described cannot also be explained by mechanical means then it has no meaning for me.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 108 guests