TrainingDummy wrote:I'm really interested to know, why in the Information Age, that some teachers refuse to pass everything they know, and furthermore risk that their knowledge will die with them.
cdobe wrote:Some stuff might give you a cutting edge over others, so you don' give it away lightly. Combatively or in other ways. Another thing is that other instructors, who don't have a lot to offer themselves, take your traditional exercises without giving any credit to your tradition, tell lies about their origins and compete with you as teachers.
CD
TrainingDummy wrote:cerebus wrote:Heh, heh. I've nothing against money. Only against using the promise of "secrets" to make the money. I believe that if a student is paying their dues and doing the work, and has shown themselves to be a decent person who won't abuse what they've learned, they should be taught everything which the teacher can teach them.
Hi cerebus,
What would constitute "abuse [of] what they've learned", in your opinion?
Thanks,
Dummy
cerebus wrote:TrainingDummy wrote:cerebus wrote:Heh, heh. I've nothing against money. Only against using the promise of "secrets" to make the money. I believe that if a student is paying their dues and doing the work, and has shown themselves to be a decent person who won't abuse what they've learned, they should be taught everything which the teacher can teach them.
Hi cerebus,
What would constitute "abuse [of] what they've learned", in your opinion?
Hello. I'm thinking along the lines of training someone to become a skilled fighter who then goes around bullying people and beating folks up in bar fights, or becoming a leg-breaker for a loanshark, that sort of thing.
Doc Stier wrote: the Sifu wouldn't hesitate to come by unexpectedly to break your frickin' legs, or to terminate your life in a garbage dumpster somewhere. And that wasn't an idle threat, it was a serious promise!
Ron Panunto wrote:"Secrets" are an excuse for those who don't want to practice or do the requisite research.
Doc Stier wrote:When I began my training in 1961, all of the old time teachers made it quite clear to their students that they gave you your gung-fu, and they could take it away from you as well, if need be. In other words, simply stated, if you decide to use your gung-fu for "bullying people and beating folks up in bar fights, or becoming a leg-breaker for a loanshark", or as a hitman for the Mob, and so forth, the Sifu wouldn't hesitate to come by unexpectedly to break your frickin' legs, or to terminate your life in a garbage dumpster somewhere. And that wasn't an idle threat, it was a serious promise!
C.J.Wang wrote:teachers who would "take gung-fu away" from deviant students,
C.J.Wang wrote:Doc Stier wrote:When I began my training in 1961, all of the old time teachers made it quite clear to their students that they gave you your gung-fu, and they could take it away from you as well, if need be. In other words, simply stated, if you decide to use your gung-fu for "bullying people and beating folks up in bar fights, or becoming a leg-breaker for a loanshark", or as a hitman for the Mob, and so forth, the Sifu wouldn't hesitate to come by unexpectedly to break your frickin' legs, or to terminate your life in a garbage dumpster somewhere. And that wasn't an idle threat, it was a serious promise!
I've also heard teachers who would "take gung-fu away" from deviant students, but it doesn't invovle harming the students physically. What they would do is to either withhold information or give misleading instruction that'd cause their gung fu to deteriorate.
C.J.Wang wrote:I've also heard teachers who would "take gung-fu away" from deviant students, but it doesn't invovle harming the students physically. What they would do is to either withhold information or give misleading instruction that'd cause their gung fu to deteriorate.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: twocircles13 and 28 guests