Niall Keane wrote:The book only lists them. They are inside inside the door methods. Its a quality control thing.... Not a bad idea considering the depths much of public domain tai chi has sunk to?
They have been taught to sincere individuals from other styles from time to time. Some from stlyes that had lost some or all of them. Though this is not publically broadcast in detail. They keep them just as "secret", perhaps more so?
Bao wrote:Niall Keane wrote:The book only lists them. They are inside inside the door methods. Its a quality control thing.... Not a bad idea considering the depths much of public domain tai chi has sunk to?
They have been taught to sincere individuals from other styles from time to time. Some from stlyes that had lost some or all of them. Though this is not publically broadcast in detail. They keep them just as "secret", perhaps more so?
It's not bad showing them. No one learns from a book anyway. Only people who knows and have practice similar exercises well can benefit from descriptions in a book. The only reason to not show them or describe them in more detail would be if they were meant to be used as parlour tricks, for show and demonstrations. The glare would disappear if people know how simple, for instance, the Shaolin tricks and other MA show stuff are. If the methods indeed were "the real deal", the art would benefit a lot from openness and demystification.
I lost you there for a second as the methods are never demoed or put on show... I guess you refer to the jump test thing, its a side effect, not an exercise, its not " practiced " .
wayne hansen wrote:Niall I read your attachment again it is excellent
I have sent it to my students who know this set
e
allen2saint wrote:
Just curious if anyone has seen this and if it compares?
I get from this discussion, which I appreciate, that this will have to be something I learn from someone. I think my past teacher knew it, but only taught it to a very few students...who all kicked our asses cause we didn't have it.
wayne hansen wrote:Sorry about the mix up Neil /Niall
I don't speak celtic
wayne hansen wrote:The only Celtic I know is
Pogue mahone
Did I get that right
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests